How can XXN affect the admissibility of evidence?

The notion that XXN (cross-examination) can affect the admissibility of evidence is closely tied to the principle of completeness in evidential law. When a party presents only portions of a document during examination, cross-examination can necessitate the admission of the entire document to ensure that the context and meaning are preserved. This principle aims to prevent misleading interpretations that might arise from viewing only incomplete parts of a document.

Admitting the whole document fosters fairness and allows the tribunal or the jury to consider the full context in which the presented portions exist. In this regard, the cross-examiner may highlight inconsistencies or nuances that only become evident when the entire document is assessed. Hence, cross-examination serves as a mechanism through which the integrity and accuracy of the presented evidence can be upheld.

Other options do not accurately reflect the role of cross-examination in relation to evidence admissibility. For instance, eliminating irrelevant documents pertains to pre-trial processes or objections but does not align with the specific impact of cross-examination on admissibility. Furthermore, the restriction of witness types and the increase of burden of proof are also concepts that relate to different evidential criteria and procedural matters rather than the direct effects of cross-examination.