How does the exclusion of evidence promote fairness during trials?

The exclusion of evidence promotes fairness during trials primarily by ensuring that only legally obtained evidence is considered. This principle is vital because it upholds the integrity of the judicial process and protects individuals' rights. When evidence is gathered in violation of established legal standards—for example, through illegal searches, coercion, or without proper warrants—its inclusion in a trial could lead to unjust outcomes and undermine public confidence in the legal system.

By excluding such evidence, the legal framework helps to maintain an environment where the rights of the accused are respected, and the prosecutions are obligated to meet a threshold of ethical standards in their evidence-gathering practices. This ultimately contributes to a fairer trial process, where judgments are made based on reliable and lawfully obtained information rather than on potentially prejudicial or illegitimate data.

Other options may seem appealing at first glance, but they do not directly contribute to the promotion of fairness in the same manner. Allowing all evidence to be presented could lead to the inclusion of unreliable or unlawfully obtained evidence, undermining the credibility of the legal process. Prioritizing testimonials over physical evidence does not inherently address the fairness aspect and may even bias the proceedings depending on the nature of the testimonies. Simplifying legal procedures does not necessarily correlate