What characteristics are considered for admissions made by lies?

The choice identifying admissions made by lies as "deliberate, related, precise, and reveals knowledge" is correct because it encapsulates the essential elements that characterize these types of admissions. An admission made through lies often requires a person to have an understanding of the facts, actively change or manipulate the truth, and present information that is specific and applicable to the matter at hand.

The deliberate nature of the admission indicates that the person intended to mislead or falsify information. When such admissions are precise, they contribute to the specificity of the statement, which often makes them more impactful in legal scenarios. Furthermore, revealing knowledge implies that the person making the admission possesses some level of understanding about the situation, which can lead to implications regarding credibility and intent.

In contrast, general or vague admissions would not hold the same weight in legal considerations, as they lack specificity that ties them to concrete facts. Admissions made only in written form or in the presence of a lawyer do not inherently determine their credibility or relevance, as verbal or informal admissions can also possess significant evidentiary value. Thus, the characteristics of admissions made by lies hinge on their deliberate, precise, and knowledgeable nature.