What discretion does EAC 136 confer compared to EAC 135?

The correct answer highlights the discretion to limit evidence, which is a key aspect of EAC 136 in comparison to EAC 135. EAC 136 allows for more nuanced control over the evidence presented in court. This discretion is particularly important as it enables a judge to restrict certain evidence that may be deemed overly prejudicial, irrelevant, or otherwise inappropriate for consideration in the case at hand.

In contrast, while EAC 135 may grant some level of discretion regarding the admissibility of evidence, it does not extend to the same degree of limiting evidence as EAC 136 does. The ability to limit evidence can lead to more streamlined proceedings, ensuring that juries or judges focus only on the evidence that pertains directly to the matter being adjudicated, thereby promoting a fair trial.

Understanding this distinction is crucial for practitioners as it directly impacts the strategy employed in presenting and challenging evidence in court.