What is the implication of EAC 136 for the admissibility of evidence?

The implication of EAC 136 for the admissibility of evidence is that it grants courts the discretion to limit certain types of evidence. This provision recognizes that while evidence may be relevant, the court can assess its admissibility based on factors such as fairness, the potential for unfair prejudice, or confusion of the issues. By allowing courts to exercise discretion in this manner, EAC 136 aims to ensure that the judicial process remains focused on reliable information that contributes constructively to the discovery of truth, while simultaneously upholding principles of justice and fair trial.

In contrast, the other options do not accurately represent the provision's impact on admissibility. EAC 136 does not allow evidence that is less than reliable, nor does it universally admit all hearsay evidence. Additionally, it does not completely exclude expert evidence; instead, it provides a framework for assessing its admissibility based on its relevance and reliability. Thus, the correct understanding of EAC 136 is that it empowers courts to tailor their approach to evidence admission, ensuring that it aligns with the overarching goals of the legal process.