What must happen for the truth of contents to be proven under EAC 102 exceptions?

The correct answer highlights that if a recognized exception applies under the Evidence Act 1995 (EAC) Section 102, then the truth of the contents of a statement can be admitted into evidence without traditional requirements for hearsay. EAC 102 outlines specific categories of exceptions where the hearsay rule does not preclude the admission of a statement that may otherwise be considered hearsay.

These exceptions typically involve circumstances where the statement has a special reliability due to the context in which it was made or the nature of the statement itself, such as dying declarations or statements made in the course of business. When such an exception applies, the statement is considered sufficiently reliable, allowing the contents to be proven without the necessity for additional corroborating evidence or the presence of the witness who made the statement.

In contrast, the other choices do not encapsulate the necessary legal framework surrounding hearsay exceptions in the EAC. The presence of a witness is not a requirement when an exception applies, and a statement can be valid without needing an expert to validate it. Moreover, the notion that no exceptions are needed does not align with the evidence rules, as exceptions are precisely what allows certain hearsay statements to be considered admissible. Thus, understanding the importance of having a