What type of statements can be deemed admissible according to EAC 60?

Under section 60 of the Evidence Act in Queensland, a statement can be deemed admissible if it is used to prove the truth of the fact asserted within that statement. This principle is grounded in the approach that certain statements, especially those made in the course of facts, can substantiate the case by confirming the veracity of a particular claim or fact.

When a statement is offered for the truth of the matter asserted, it is assessed against specific criteria that establish its relevance and reliability. If such a statement meets these criteria, it may be admissible in court as evidence to support a particular assertion or narrative being presented.

The other options are less applicable in the context of EAC 60. Providing background context typically involves statements that are not necessarily considered for their truth value but rather to frame the circumstances surrounding an event. While authentication is important, it does not exclusively dictate admissibility under section 60; it relates more to reliability and confirmatory standards rather than the purpose for which the statement is being introduced. Finally, the assertion that statements cannot be used at all contradicts the allowable nature of certain statements under EAC 60 that can be proved true. Thus, the framework of this section supports the admissibility of statements to verify factual assertions