When can previous consistent statements be used as per EAC 102?

The correct response emphasizes the role of previous consistent statements in rebutting denials made against a witness's testimony. Under the Evidence Act of Queensland, previous consistent statements can be used when there is an attack on the credibility of a witness or when a witness's account is challenged, enabling them to reinforce the reliability of their testimony. This is particularly relevant in situations where a witness's honesty or accuracy is put into question, as it can help to demonstrate that the witness's claims are steadfast and consistent over time, supporting the integrity of their current statements in court.

Using previous consistent statements solely for purposes related to credibility or confirming prior statements does not encompass the broader, rebuttal function of such evidence. This is critical because it underscores the strategic use of these statements to counter specific attacks on the witness's reliability rather than just presenting them as standalone affirmations of their previous assertions.