Which type of statement must be admitted in total when an admission is made?

When an admission is made, the entire statement must be admitted as evidence. This principle is grounded in the nature of admissions, as they are typically considered binding declarations made by a party against their interest. In legal proceedings, when a party admits to certain facts, the complete context of those admissions is crucial for a fair assessment of the situation.

The rationale behind this approach is that excluding parts of the admission could distort the meaning and intent behind what has been said. If only portions favoring the admitting party were considered, or if irrelevant details were excluded, it could lead to an unfair advantage or misinterpretation of the admitted facts. Hence, the requirement to admit the entire statement promotes candor and accuracy in the judicial process, ensuring that all contextual elements are available for evaluation.

The other options diverge from this understanding. Favoring only parts beneficial to the admitting party would undermine the purpose of an admission. Similarly, admitting only relevant details or restricting the admission to documented statements goes against the fundamental rule that a full admission must be treated as a complete declaration of fact.